Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 20 + 1 road tests and 18 + 1,813 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera Sport SU2 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Tests 76 · 1 test Owners 60 · 1,813 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 1 tests | 81 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 62 |
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 58.6 = 72
Powergy: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 62 = 71
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 1 tests | 84 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 65 |
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 64.2 = 76
Powergy: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 64.9 = 71
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests | 87 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 50 | 56 |
N Fera Sport SU2: 40% × 86.9 + 60% × 49.9 = 65
Powergy: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 55.9 = 63
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 1 tests | 93 | 79 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 83
Powergy: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Sport SU2 or Powergy. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 61 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 41 | 52 |
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 41 = 54
Powergy: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Powergy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 62 |
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 1 tests | 47 | 74 |
| Category | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 68 |
| Dry | 72 | 71 |
| Wet | 76 | 71 |
| Comfort | 65 | 63 |
| Noise | 83 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 62 |
| Efficiency | 47 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
N Fera Sport SU2
Powergy
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | Powergy | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 94% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 91% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 93% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% #11/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 81% #8/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #6/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 96% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 95% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 93% #3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% #10/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 81% #5/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | #5/10 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the Pirelli Powergy is largely mixed, with the tire frequently viewed as an eco/budget, mid-tier option suitable for daily driving rather than high-performance use. While some users consider it a cost-effective, fuel-efficient choice from a reputable brand, others report negative experiences including excessive highway vibrations and potential sidewall defects. A significant number of discussions also revolve around general inquiries regarding safety, longevity, and whether it can be mixed with other Pirelli models.
“Pirelli cinturato P7 and Pirelli Powergy Hi all 👋🏼 So I had 4 Pirelli Cinturato P7’s on my Ford Focus ST. I got a flat tire (front left) while I was on vacation so I decided to get 2 new tires at the front. I asked the guy at the tire shop to get the same tires (so the Pirelli Cinturato’s). He got me Pirelli Powergy’s instead… He didn’t really speak English and there was not time as I was driving home the next day. So I just accepted it. Now my question is what’s the main difference between these tires? And does it matter I got 2 different tires now? (2 powergy’s at the front and 2 Cinturato’s at the back) Thanks!🙏🏼”
“Avg 29mpg on a 2015 Mazda 3 Sport Nav 2L 165bhp, any ideas? I've had this car for about 3-4 weeks now, posted it here on this subreddit too. So far, I've done about 800 miles and my average fuel consumtion seems to be around 29mpg - 10.2L/100km. The car doesn't have its original rims, its on **MAM RS3** 18" rims with Pirelli Powergy tires 215/45/R18 (internet says these tires provide good fuel economy). On longer trips the average is about 40mpg-45mpg which still seems a bit high. My work commute is about 2 miles, and I do occasionally drive in a spirited manner. Is this okay? Thank you all!”
“Ripples in side wall Just been washing the car and found what I can only describe as ripples in the side wall of my front-right tyre. Had these fitted in June, only just noticed the ripples. The other tyres are perfect. I’ve probably done around 2,000 miles on them. Should I be concerned, and do they look like a manufacturing defect, or as a result of damage? (I’ve not hit any serious potholes that I’m aware of). These tyres are Pirelli Powergy, fitted to a Volvo XC60. Date code is 3325. Any help gratefully received. Read more”
Based on 15 community posts
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | B · Pirelli Powergy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 87 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Pirelli Powergy
Narrow edge: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — better noise and wet. Pick the Pirelli Powergy if efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.
Pirelli Powergy scores 74 vs 47 on efficiency.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 83 vs 74 on noise.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
Pirelli Powergy scores 58 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 76 vs 71 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 83 vs 74 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Pirelli Powergy, 58 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Pirelli Powergy, 74 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology