Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Nexen N Fera Primus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 20 + 7 road tests and 18 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: N Fera Sport SU2 68, N Fera Primus 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
N Fera Primus +375Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 7 tests 81 73 Reviews found online 59 78 N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 59.1 = 72
N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 77.8 = 75
-
76
Wet
N Fera Primus +985Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / 7 tests 84 86 Reviews found online 64 84 N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 84.1 + 40% × 64.4 = 76
N Fera Primus: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 83.5 = 85
-
66
Comfort
N Fera Sport SU2 +957Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests 89 32 Reviews found online 51 74 N Fera Sport SU2: 40% × 89.1 + 60% × 50.6 = 66
N Fera Primus: 40% × 32.2 + 60% × 73.8 = 57
-
83
Noise
N Fera Sport SU2 +1865Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 4 tests 95 64 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83
N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
54
Treadwear
N Fera Sport SU2 +450Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests 63 33 Reviews found online 41 77 N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 63 + 40% × 40.8 = 54
N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 76.8 = 50
-
61
Handling (owners)
N Fera Primus +1475Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Reviews found online 61 75 -
47
Efficiency
N Fera Primus +754Why this score
Source N Fera Sport SU2 N Fera Primus Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 5 tests 47 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 69 |
| Dry | 72 | 75 |
| Wet | 76 | 85 |
| Comfort | 66 | 57 |
| Noise | 83 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 75 |
| Efficiency | 47 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
N Fera Sport SU2
69
/ 100
N Fera Primus
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera Primus | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 95% #17/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #16/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 91% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 60% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% #11/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 91% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #6/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 93% #7/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 89% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 86% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 95% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 40% #9/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 98% #13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 65% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 65% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 75% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 59% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 95% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% #10/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 87% #17/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 96% #2/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 75% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #5/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | #19/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 91% #4/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 57% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | #7/10 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera Sport SU2
Pros
- Significantly cheaper than premium tier alternatives like Michelin and Continental
- Impressive dry grip and predictable, controllable handling
- Strong wet weather performance and high-speed stability
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often requiring replacement prematurely
- Stiff carcass leading to mediocre ride comfort and harshness over road imperfections
- Soft rubber compound prone to squirming under hard cornering or experiencing shoulder damage
Tire B N Fera Primus
Pros
- Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
- High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
- Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives
Cons
- Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
- Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
- Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | B · Nexen N Fera Primus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 50 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
69
/ 100
Nexen N Fera Primus
Too close to call: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 and Nexen N Fera Primus are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is stronger on noise, comfort and treadwear. Nexen N Fera Primus is stronger on handling, wet and efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 83 vs 65 on noise.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 75 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 85 vs 76 on wet.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Tire B · Nexen N Fera Primus
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 85 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 83 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 54 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N Fera Sport SU2 or N Fera Primus?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 54 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology