tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Nexen N Fera Primus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 7 road tests and 2,521 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–69

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire AHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire BNexen

N Fera Primus

Summer

± 6

Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 6 tests that measured dry braking for both, Ventus Prime 4 won 6 and N Fera Primus won 0 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured wet braking for both, Ventus Prime 4 won 4 and N Fera Primus won 0 (average 95% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, Ventus Prime 4 won 1 and N Fera Primus won 3 (average 93% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 4 tests that measured wear for both, Ventus Prime 4 won 4 and N Fera Primus won 0 (average 67% vs 51% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured curved aquaplaning for both, Ventus Prime 4 won 0 and N Fera Primus won 3 (average 82% vs 89% of the best).
  1. 79

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 7 tests8373
    Reviews found online7377
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 6–098%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%98%

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 77.3 = 75

  2. 77

    Wet

    N Fera Primus +8
    85
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 7 tests7986
    Reviews found online7583
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–382%89%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–393%96%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 4–095%93%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–191%89%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%92%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–199%99%

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 83.3 = 85

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7032
    Reviews found online6773

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69

    N Fera Primus: 40% × 31.8 + 60% × 73.3 = 57

  4. 61

    Noise

    N Fera Primus +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 4 tests5864
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–198%98%

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 74

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +23
    51
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests7934
    Reviews found online6777
    Abrasion (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–067%53%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 4–067%51%

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 33.7 + 40% × 76.9 = 51

  6. 72

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera Primus +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Reviews found online7275
  7. 84

    Efficiency

    Ventus Prime 4 +30
    54
    Why this score
    SourceVentus Prime 4N Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 5 tests8454
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–197%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–088%75%
Scores at a glance
CategoryHankook Ventus Prime 4Nexen N Fera Primus
Relative Score 75 69
Dry 79 75
Wet 77 85
Comfort 69 57
Noise 61 65
Treadwear 74 51
Handling (owners) 72 75
Efficiency 84 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Ventus Prime 4

± 6

N Fera Primus

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Hankook Ventus Prime 4 finished ahead 6 times and Nexen N Fera Primus 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryVentus Prime 4N Fera PrimusΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% 95% +3.2 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 100% 98% +1.6 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 82% 89% −7.5 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 93% 96% −2.8 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Braking Wet 95% 93% +2.0 4–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 91% 89% +1.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Circle Wet 98% 92% +6.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wet Handling Wet 99% 99% 0.0 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 98% 98% +0.4 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 67% 53% +14.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Wear Treadwear 67% 51% +16.6 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 97% 97% +0.8 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% 75% +12.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 69% 75% −6.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #4/20 #19/20 – 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 67% 57% +9.9 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 215/55 R17
Overall Ranking Overall #4/55 #11/55 – 6–0 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

Tire B N Fera Primus

Pros

  • Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
  • High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
  • Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives

Cons

  • Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
  • Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
  • Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
All owner themes in the N Fera Primus review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/TireQuestions ·1 upvote ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/croautomobili ·1 upvote ·2026-09-23

“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera Primus

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 B · Nexen N Fera Primus
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6650
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 19″
UTQG200 - 420 A A—
Sizes in common4040

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Nexen N Fera Primus

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Nexen N Fera Primus if wet and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 84 vs 54 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera Primus scores 85 vs 77 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera Primus
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Nexen N Fera Primus, 85 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Nexen N Fera Primus, 65 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ventus Prime 4 or N Fera Primus?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 84 vs 54 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology