Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 7 reviews
Cooper Zeon 4XS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Cooper Zeon 4XS vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) – Reviews found online 79 – Zeon 4XS: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
81
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 78 (est.) – Reviews found online 84 – Zeon 4XS: 60% × 78.1 (est.) + 40% × 84.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
76
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 80 – Zeon 4XS: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
74
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Raptor HR Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 78 – Zeon 4XS: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon 4XS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Zeon 4XS Raptor HR Reviews found online 78 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon 4XS | Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | – |
| Dry | 75 | – |
| Wet | 81 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | – |
| Treadwear | 74 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Zeon 4XS
–
/ 100
Raptor HR
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Zeon 4XS
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- High level of cabin comfort with minimal road noise
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin and Pirelli
Cons
- Limited brand recognition compared to major market leaders
- Potential for reduced dry grip due to wide groove patterns
- Uncertainty regarding long-term tread life for some users
Tire B Raptor HR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon 4XS | B · Riken Raptor HR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Grand Touring All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Cooper Zeon 4XS
–
/ 100
Riken Raptor HR
Only Cooper Zeon 4XS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Cooper Zeon 4XS
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology