Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 33 reviews
Cooper Zeon CS6 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Cooper Zeon CS6 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 81 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 78–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 81 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
N Fera SU4 +1279Why this score
Source Zeon CS6 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 67 85 Zeon CS6: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
N Fera SU4: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.6 = 79
No road tests of dry for Zeon CS6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
N Fera SU4 +1382Why this score
Source Zeon CS6 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 68 86 Zeon CS6: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.9 (est.) + 40% × 85.7 = 82
No road tests of wet for Zeon CS6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +1276Why this score
Source Zeon CS6 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 62 80 Zeon CS6: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61.6 = 64
N Fera SU4: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Zeon CS6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Treadwear
Level71Why this score
Source Zeon CS6 N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 73 74 Zeon CS6: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
N Fera SU4: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon CS6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
66
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +1379Why this score
Source Zeon CS6 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 66 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon CS6 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 78 |
| Dry | 67 | 79 |
| Wet | 69 | 82 |
| Comfort | 64 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Zeon CS6
78
/ 100
N Fera SU4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Zeon CS6
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise on certain surfaces
- Occasional structural issues including sidewall bulges
- Some reports of premature rubber cracking
Tire B N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon CS6 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Cooper Zeon CS6
78
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 69 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Cooper Zeon CS6
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Zeon CS6 or N Fera SU4?
Which is better in the wet, Zeon CS6 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 82 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon CS6 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 79 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Zeon CS6 or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Zeon CS6 or N Fera SU4?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology