Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 81 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Nexen N Blue HD — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 81 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 78–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
N Fera SU4 +2356Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 85 49 N Fera SU4: 60% × 74.8 (est.) + 40% × 84.6 = 79
N Blue HD: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 56
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
82
Wet
N Fera SU4 +2161Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 79 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 86 58 N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.9 (est.) + 40% × 85.7 = 82
N Blue HD: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
76
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +2551Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 80 43 N Fera SU4: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76
N Blue HD: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.2 = 51
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +1754Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 74 46 N Fera SU4: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 71
N Blue HD: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +3247Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 N Blue HD Reviews found online 79 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 56 |
| Dry | 79 | 56 |
| Wet | 82 | 61 |
| Comfort | 76 | 51 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
N Fera SU4
56
/ 100
N Blue HD
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B N Blue HD
Pros
- Good initial wet and dry grip when new
- Attractive budget-friendly price point
- Decent fuel economy and highway stability early in their lifecycle
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tires wear down
- Rapid degradation of grip in wet and dry conditions after initial mileage
- Shorter than expected tread life, especially on front axles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 5 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
56
/ 100
Nexen N Blue HD
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Blue HD rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 51 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 79 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 61 on wet.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 82 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 79 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or N Blue HD?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology