Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Nexen N Blue HD — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1856Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests 79 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 67 50 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
N Blue HD: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 56
No road tests of dry for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
79
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1861Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests 85 ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 58 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79
N Blue HD: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61
No road tests of wet for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Comfort
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1052Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 60 ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 63 44 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62
N Blue HD: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.9 = 52
No road tests of comfort for N Blue HD. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests 66 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1653Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 73 ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 63 45 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
N Blue HD: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1848Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Reviews found online 66 48 -
32
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun N Blue HD Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests 32 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 56 |
| Dry | 74 | 56 |
| Wet | 79 | 61 |
| Comfort | 62 | 52 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 48 |
| Efficiency | 32 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
56
/ 100
N Blue HD
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N Blue HD | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #14/17 2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B N Blue HD
Pros
- Good initial wet and dry grip when new
- Attractive budget-friendly price point
- Decent fuel economy and highway stability early in their lifecycle
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tires wear down
- Rapid degradation of grip in wet and dry conditions after initial mileage
- Shorter than expected tread life, especially on front axles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Nexen N Blue HD
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Nexen N Blue HD |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
56
/ 100
Nexen N Blue HD
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Blue HD rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 66 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 53 on treadwear.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 62 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or N Blue HD?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology