Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 80 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 80 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: N Fera SU4 78, Ventus Prime 4 77.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +180Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 85 73 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
81
Wet
N Fera SU4 +378Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 79 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 85 75 N Fera SU4: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +869Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 80 68 N Fera SU4: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.1 = 77
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +374Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 74 67 N Fera SU4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
80
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +872Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 80 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison83Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 77 |
| Dry | 79 | 80 |
| Wet | 81 | 78 |
| Comfort | 77 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
N Fera SU4
77
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Nexen N Fera SU4
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
77
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Too close to call: Nexen N Fera SU4 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera SU4 is stronger on comfort, handling and wet. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is stronger on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 69 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 81 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 71 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or Ventus Prime 4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 81 vs 78 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or Ventus Prime 4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology