tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Cooper Zeon CS8 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 4 road tests and 17 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or Zeon CS8 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Zeon CS8
Tire ACooper

Zeon CS8

Summer

± 7

Tests 61 · 12 tests Owners 70 · 17 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests5478
    Reviews found online7268
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–292%97%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    Zeon CS8: 60% × 53.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 61

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

  2. 73

    Wet

    Zeon CS8 +6
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests7370
    Reviews found online7464
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–186%87%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%97%

    Zeon CS8: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online–12

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Zeon CS8 +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7061

    Zeon CS8: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 70 = 70

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Zeon CS8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    Zeon CS8 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests7675
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)60

    Zeon CS8: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Zeon CS8. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests5275
    Reviews found online6659
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–170%71%

    Zeon CS8: 60% × 52.2 + 40% × 66 = 58

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6972
  8. 42

    Efficiency

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +29
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests4271
Scores at a glance
CategoryCooper Zeon CS8Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 65 69
Dry 61 74
Wet 73 67
Snow – 36
Comfort 70 62
Noise 72 69
Treadwear 58 69
Handling (owners) 69 72
Efficiency 42 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Zeon CS8

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Cooper Zeon CS8 finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryZeon CS8ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 97% −5.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 86% 87% −0.7 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 98% 97% +1.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wear Treadwear 70% 71% −1.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #29/45 #16/45 – 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Zeon CS8

Pros

  • Excellent wet-weather grip and braking performance
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall perishing and cracking
  • Inconsistent tread life with some users experiencing rapid wear
  • Increased road noise as the tire reaches the end of its life
All owner themes in the Zeon CS8 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Cooper Zeon CS8

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Zeon CS8 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper Zeon CS8

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better efficiency, dry and treadwear. Pick the Cooper Zeon CS8 if comfort, wet and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 42 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Zeon CS8 scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Cooper Zeon CS8
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Cooper Zeon CS8, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Cooper Zeon CS8, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Cooper Zeon CS8, 70 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Zeon CS8 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 42 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology