Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 11 reviews
Cooper Zeon LTZ vs Kumho Ecsta PS91 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 11 + 485 owner reviews. How we score
Zeon LTZ is ahead, 62–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 485 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 (exterior noise)
“Putting some Kumho Ecsta PS91s on. Curious how they’ll do since my go to Falken rt660 doesn’t come in the oem 18” sizes”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Ecsta PS91 +466Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 58 51 Zeon LTZ: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 62
Ecsta PS91: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 50.9 = 66
No road tests of dry for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Ecsta PS91 +268Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 64 52 Zeon LTZ: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 66
Ecsta PS91: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 51.5 = 68
No road tests of wet for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
47
Snow
Zeon LTZ +938Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 30 15 Zeon LTZ: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 47
Ecsta PS91: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 15 = 38
No road tests of snow for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
Zeon LTZ +654Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 56 48 Zeon LTZ: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.4 = 60
Ecsta PS91: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.7 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Zeon LTZ +262Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 60 50 Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
Ecsta PS91: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 49.6 = 62
No road tests of noise for Zeon LTZ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Zeon LTZ +2244Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 65 30 Zeon LTZ: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
Ecsta PS91: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 30.2 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for Zeon LTZ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Zeon LTZ +1153Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Reviews found online 64 53 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison47Why this score
Source Zeon LTZ Ecsta PS91 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon LTZ | Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 57 |
| Dry | 62 | 66 |
| Wet | 66 | 68 |
| Snow | 47 | 38 |
| Comfort | 60 | 54 |
| Noise | 64 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 53 |
| Efficiency | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Zeon LTZ
Ecsta PS91
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Zeon LTZ
Pros
- Comfortable and smooth highway ride quality
- Aggressive, attractive aesthetic that suits sport utility vehicles
- Good longevity and treadwear, with multiple users reporting up to 50,000 miles of use
Cons
- Poor traction in snow, ice, and deep sand
- Limited availability and sourcing difficulties
- Occasional reports of premature failure or punctures from dissatisfied users
Tire B Ecsta PS91
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
- Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
- Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
- Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
- Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Cooper Zeon LTZ
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecsta PS91
The community views the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as an attractive, budget-friendly max performance summer tire that offers decent street traction, low noise, and a tread pattern resembling higher-end options like Michelin. However, opinions are split; while some drivers praise them as a great value alternative for daily driving and light spirited use, enthusiasts note limitations regarding rapid wear, subpar track endurance, and inferior grip compared to top-tier performance tires.
“Putting some Kumho Ecsta PS91s on. Curious how they’ll do since my go to Falken rt660 doesn’t come in the oem 18” sizes”
“New meaty tires set up installed, now I can order spacers Went up tire sizes and they definitely fill the gap a bit. First time running sticky kumhos on anytime so excited to see how they turn out.Specs are Kumho Ecsta Ps91 235/40/18 up front and 265/40/18 in the rear. Read more”
“You will get smoked if you go with the PS91. They also do not hold well under abuse. I feel that the RE-71RS would be a better value for you simply because they'll hold and remain consistent even as they wear very far down. I've used the RE-71RS at a track day before and even as the tires were chunking and melting, they still maintained their grip, as if they were just BEGGING to be abused, to see how far they could be pushed.”
Based on 46 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon LTZ | B · Kumho Ecsta PS91 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 520 A B | 260 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Cooper Zeon LTZ
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Winner: Cooper Zeon LTZ — better treadwear, handling and snow. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS91 if dry matters most to you. Cooper Zeon LTZ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 66 vs 44 on treadwear.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 64 vs 53 on handling.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 47 vs 38 on snow.
Cooper Zeon LTZ scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Which is better in the wet, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Kumho Ecsta PS91, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 47 vs 38 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Zeon LTZ or Ecsta PS91?
Cooper Zeon LTZ, 66 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology