Summer tire Updated October 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS91 review

Relative score 60% tests + 40% owners

Owners 47 · 485 reviews analysed Road tests 76 · 9 tests

How scores work
Add your size for an exact match
/R

The Amazon link then searches this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is generally well-received as a cost-effective, high-performance summer tire that delivers impressive dry and wet grip, often compared favorably to more expensive tier-one alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. However, user experiences are somewhat polarized regarding tread longevity, with several drivers noting rapid wear and stiff sidewalls that can contribute to a firmer ride and tramlining on uneven highway surfaces.

Community sentiment Mixed Read the buzz
#budget performance value#rapid tread wear#wet and dry traction#track and heat limitations#ride quality and appearance

Owners rate it 29.3 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews found online; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

How scores work
Relative score
0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
Road tests
0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
Owner reviews
0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.

By owner reviews

47/100

From 485 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.

Would buy again 53%
Dry
Overall dry
56.5
Corner stability
55.5
Dry traction
57
Steering response
55.3
Wet
Overall wet
55.2
Hydroplaning resistance
56.6
Wet traction
57.2
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
17
Comfort
Overall comfort
52.8
Ride comfort
50.6
Noise
Overall noise
53.9
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
36.6
Handling
Overall handling
56.7

Own these tires? Write a review →

By road tests

76/100

Scaled across every tested tire: the average gets 70, the best 100.

Dry
75.5
Wet
77.4
Noise
74.9
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
50%
Dry Handling
37.5%
Subj. Dry Handling
37.5%
Wet Braking
25%
Subj. Wet Handling
37.5%
Wet Handling
25%
Straight Aquaplaning
25%
Inside Noise level
62.5%
Subjective Comfort
37.5%
Rolling Resistance
12.5%
tire Weight
25%

Kumho Ecsta PS91 specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

Specifications
Tread depth9.5/32″
UTQG260 A A
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi
SizeRetailer
225/35 R19 Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 485 owner reviews found online.

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is generally well-received as a cost-effective, high-performance summer tire that delivers impressive dry and wet grip, often compared favorably to more expensive tier-one alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. However, user experiences are somewhat polarized regarding tread longevity, with several drivers noting rapid wear and stiff sidewalls that can contribute to a firmer ride and tramlining on uneven highway surfaces.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback
  • Relatively low noise levels and improved ride comfort compared to factory run-flats

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
  • Occasional reports of sidewall cracking or premature structural failure

Worth knowing

  • Drivers of heavy rear-wheel-drive sedans and high-torque vehicles (such as BMW 3/5 series and high-horsepower saloons) frequently report faster rear tire wear and occasional skittishness in wet conditions as tread depths lower.
  • Owners replacing factory run-flat tires with the Kumho PS91 noted a dramatic improvement in ride smoothness and a reduction in harshness, though steering weight can feel heavier due to the stiff sidewalls.

Reviews from our readers

Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.

No reviews from our readers yet

Driving on the Kumho Ecsta PS91? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.

Write a review
Overall rating
Rate what you have tried (optional)
Dry grip
Wet grip
Handling
Ride comfort
Quietness
Treadwear
Would you buy them again? (optional)

At least 40 characters.

Leave it empty to post anonymously.

We read every review before it goes live. Your IP address is never shown; a scrambled form of it is kept for up to a year to stop spam.

9 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2023 Sport Auto UHP tire Test · 225/40 R18

8th of 11
Best: Noise · 1st Weakest: Dry Handling · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 11
Wet Handling7th of 11
Dry Braking5th of 11
Dry Handling10th of 11
Rolling Resistance8th of 11
Straight Aqua7th of 11
Noise1st of 11
Price4th of 11

Source: Sport Auto

2023 AZ UHP Summer tire Test · 235/35 R19

8th of 10
Best: Price · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 10
Wet Handling5th of 10
Dry Braking7th of 10
Dry Handling7th of 10
Rolling Resistance8th of 10
Straight Aqua4th of 10
Noise8th of 10
Price1st of 10

Source: Auto Zeitung

2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18

9th of 10
Best: Exterior Noise · 1st Weakest: Subj. Elk Test · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 10
Wet Circle4th of 10
Longitudinal Aquaplaning7th of 10
Transverse Aquaplaning3rd of 10
Dry Braking5th of 10
Interior Noise2nd of 10
Exterior Noise1st of 10
Rolling Resistance5th of 10
Subj. Dry Handling8th of 10
Subj. Wet Handling6th of 10
Wet8th of 10
Dry8th of 10
Wet Lateral Stability2nd of 10
Dry Subj. Steering Response8th of 10
Subj. Elk Test10th of 10
Subj. Wet Circle4th of 10

Source: AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023

2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer tire Test

7th of 8
Best: Inside Noise level · 4th Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Braking5th of 8
Dry Handling6th of 8
Subj. Dry Handling6th of 8
Wet Braking7th of 8
Wet Handling7th of 8
Subj. Wet Handling6th of 8
Straight Aquaplaning7th of 8
Subjective Comfort6th of 8
Inside Noise level4th of 8
tire Weight7th of 8
Rolling Resistance8th of 8

2017 Motor Mag UHP tire Test · 235/35 R19

4th of 9
Best: Wet Braking · 2nd Weakest: Dry Braking · 3rd
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking2nd of 9
Dry Braking3rd of 9
Dry Handling3rd of 9

Source: Motor

2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18

10th of 10
Best: Wet Handling · 5th Weakest: Dry Handling · 9th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 10
Wet Handling5th of 10
Dry Braking8th of 10
Dry Handling9th of 10

Source: Sport Auto

2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars tire Test · 235/35 R19

7th of 9
Best: Wet Braking · 4th Weakest: Wet Handling · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking4th of 9
Wet Handling7th of 9
Dry Braking4th of 9
Dry Handling7th of 9

Source: Auto Bild

2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP tire Test · 235/35 R19

7th of 7

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Sport Auto

2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer tire Test · 225/40 R18

10th of 14

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely praised as an affordable, budget-friendly summer tire with attractive styling and respectable wet or daily street performance compared to pricier rivals like Michelin. However, several users express frustration with poor tread life, rapid wear, and insufficient grip or heat endurance under hard driving and track conditions. Others also note issues with sketchy handling, flat-spotting, or vibration when cold.

Sentiment breakdown
Positive58%
Mixed22%
Negative20%
Top themes
#budget performance value#rapid tread wear#wet and dry traction#track and heat limitations#ride quality and appearance#Michelin alternative comparison

From 45 threads and comments.

Kumho Ecsta PS91 compared

Compare any two

Other tires to consider

Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.

Top rated summer tires

  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

    1,852 owner reviews · 31 tests

    87 Check price on Amazon
  2. Michelin Primacy 5 Energy

    531 owner reviews

    83 Check price on Amazon
  3. Pirelli Cinturato C3

    19 owner reviews · 9 tests

    82 Check price on Amazon

More from Kumho

  1. Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

    1,031 owner reviews · 8 tests

    79 Check price on Amazon
  2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

    5 owner reviews · 2 tests

    75 Check price on Amazon
  3. Kumho Ecsta HS52

    2,352 owner reviews · 7 tests

    76 Check price on Amazon
All Kumho tires

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.