Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 21 road tests and 485 + 12,691 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 83–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS91

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 485 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 (exterior noise)

“Putting some Kumho Ecsta PS91s on. Curious how they’ll do since my go to Falken rt660 doesn’t come in the oem 18” sizes”

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,691 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +20
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 20 tests7789
    Reviews found online5285
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 51.6 = 67

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.1 + 40% × 84.5 = 87

  2. 68

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +22
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 20 tests7993
    Reviews found online5285
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 79 + 40% × 51.9 = 68

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 93.1 + 40% × 84.7 = 90

  3. 36

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)–
    Reviews found online16–

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 15.7 = 36

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +22
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 65 (est.)83
    Reviews found online4972

    Ecsta PS91: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 48.5 = 55

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 83.4 + 60% × 72.4 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS91. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 13 tests7073
    Reviews found online50≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 50.2 = 62

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +27
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 54 (est.)78
    Reviews found online3060

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 53.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 44

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +27
    81
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online5481
  8. 48

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 +28
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 14 tests4876
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS91Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score 61 83
Dry 67 87
Wet 68 90
Snow 36 –
Comfort 55 77
Noise 62 71
Treadwear 44 71
Handling (owners) 54 81
Efficiency 48 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ecsta PS91

± 4

Pilot Sport 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Kumho Ecsta PS91 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS91Pilot Sport 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 95% −3.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 97% 98% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Braking Wet 90% 98% −8.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Handling Wet 96% 100% −4.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #10/10 #1/10 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test · 225/40 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS91

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS91 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely praised as an affordable, budget-friendly summer tire with attractive styling and respectable wet or daily street performance compared to pricier rivals like Michelin. However, several users express frustration with poor tread life, rapid wear, and insufficient grip or heat endurance under hard driving and track conditions. Others also note issues with sketchy handling, flat-spotting, or vibration when cold.

Top themes
#budget performance value#rapid tread wear#wet and dry traction#track and heat limitations#ride quality and appearance#Michelin alternative comparison

Based on 45 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS91 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available162
Rim diameters19″16″ – 20″
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG260 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better efficiency, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 90 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 90 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 77 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ecsta PS91 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology