Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 8 reviews
Dunlop Direzza DZ101 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop Direzza DZ101 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 8 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
Azenis FK510 is ahead, 74–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 910 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)
“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Azenis FK510 +573Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 68 74 Direzza DZ101: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Azenis FK510 +1784Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 65 78 Direzza DZ101: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67
Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 84
No road tests of wet for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 45 Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55
No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Direzza DZ101 +956Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 40 Reviews found online 63 67 Direzza DZ101: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65
Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.3 + 60% × 66.9 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests – 66 Reviews found online – 67 Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.9 = 66
-
61
Treadwear
Azenis FK510 +566Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 58 54 Direzza DZ101: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Direzza DZ101. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Azenis FK510 +472Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Reviews found online 68 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison50Why this score
Source Direzza DZ101 Azenis FK510 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Direzza DZ101 | Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 74 |
| Dry | 68 | 73 |
| Wet | 67 | 84 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 65 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Direzza DZ101
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Direzza DZ101
Pros
- Highly competitive price point
- Aggressive and attractive tread design
- Surprising levels of ride comfort and low noise
Cons
- Short tread life and rapid wear
- Inconsistent performance and grip quality between different sets
- Uninspiring wet weather traction for aggressive driving
Tire B Azenis FK510
Pros
- Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
- Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Dunlop Direzza DZ101
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Falken Azenis FK510
Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”
“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Based on 63 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Direzza DZ101 | B · Falken Azenis FK510 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 93 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop Direzza DZ101
Falken Azenis FK510
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Dunlop Direzza DZ101 if comfort matters most to you. Dunlop Direzza DZ101 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 67 on wet.
Dunlop Direzza DZ101 scores 65 vs 56 on comfort.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.
Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Direzza DZ101 or Azenis FK510?
Which is better in the wet, Direzza DZ101 or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Direzza DZ101 or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Direzza DZ101 or Azenis FK510?
Dunlop Direzza DZ101, 65 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Direzza DZ101 or Azenis FK510?
Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology