Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop Direzza DZ102 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Turanza ER300 Ecopia is ahead, 70–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ADunlop

Direzza DZ102

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 22 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 8 in 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 5 in 2010 Auto Bild Eco Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 Ecopia +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online6572
  2. 68

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 Ecopia +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online6774
  3. 65

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 Ecopia +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online6171
  4. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online64–
  5. 62

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 Ecopia +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online5968
  6. 63

    Handling

    Turanza ER300 Ecopia +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 Ecopia
    Reviews found online6371
Scores at a glance
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop Direzza DZ102Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
Relative Score 65 70
Dry 66 70
Wet 68 73
Comfort 65 70
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 62 67
Handling 63 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Direzza DZ102

Turanza ER300 Ecopia

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryDirezza DZ102Turanza ER300 EcopiaΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/8 · 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test 50% #2/5 · 2010 Auto Bild Eco Tyre Test −35.7 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Direzza DZ102

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
  • Surprisingly high levels of ride comfort for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid or inconsistent tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Direzza DZ102 review

Tire B Turanza ER300 Ecopia

Pros

  • Good dry grip and dependable braking performance
  • High level of ride comfort and smooth absorption of road imperfections
  • Long-lasting tread life reported by several users on standard hatchbacks and saloons

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction, with multiple users finding wet grip disappointing
  • Soft sidewalls that can diminish sharp steering response and cornering precision
  • Some complaints regarding high noise levels from specific fitments
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 Ecopia review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102 B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop Direzza DZ102

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia scores 71 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia scores 73 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Ecopia

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

Turanza ER300 Ecopia

Amazon