Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport 01 AS is ahead, 71–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    SP Sport 01 AS +17
    56
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7649

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 73

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    SP Sport 01 AS +18
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7349

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 72

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 58

    Snow

    SP Sport 01 AS +4
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5043

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 58

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    SP Sport 01 AS +13
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7750

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–53

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    SP Sport 01 AS +15
    57
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7751

    SP Sport 01 AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 72

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 01 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport 01 AS +28
    50
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 01 ASEnergy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online7850
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 01 ASMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 71 55
Dry 73 56
Wet 72 54
Snow 58 54
Comfort 73 60
Noise – 61
Treadwear 72 57
Handling (owners) 78 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 01 AS

Energy Saver A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 01 AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
  • Surprising and reliable traction and handling in deep snow
  • Good overall braking and grip performance compared to previous tires

Cons

  • Reports of weak sidewalls leading to premature damage
  • High cost relative to longevity when durability issues arise
All owner themes in the SP Sport 01 AS review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS scores 78 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS scores 72 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS scores 73 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS scores 72 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 72 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 73 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 58 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 73 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 01 AS or Energy Saver A/S?

Dunlop SP Sport 01 AS, 72 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology