tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2030 vs Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport LM705 is ahead, 65–39

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport LM705 or SP Sport 2030 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2030
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2030

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 25 · 9 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 41

    Dry

    SP Sport LM705 +25
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2665

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 50.7 (est.) + 40% × 26.3 = 41

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 46

    Wet

    SP Sport LM705 +16
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3659

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 51.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.2 = 46

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 33

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +37
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online1771

    SP Sport 2030: 40% × 58.1 (est.) + 60% × 16.8 = 33

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 62

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 35

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +33
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online1668

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 48.4 (est.) + 40% × 15.7 = 35

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 25

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport LM705 +41
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030SP Sport LM705
    Reviews found online2566
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2030Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Relative Score 39 65
Dry 41 66
Wet 46 62
Snow – 62
Comfort 33 70
Noise – 62
Treadwear 35 68
Handling (owners) 25 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 2030

± 8

SP Sport LM705

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2030

Pros

  • Good dry grip and handling performance
  • Acceptable comfort levels on select vehicles compared to prior tires
  • Decent performance in light snow and ice conditions due to a softer compound

Cons

  • Terrible and very annoying road noise on anything other than completely smooth roads
  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users needing replacements between 8,000 and 18,000 miles
  • Poor wet weather performance and slippery handling on wet surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2030 review

Tire B SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2030 B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available16
Rim diameters15″16″ – 19″
UTQG280 - 360 A - B A - B400 B A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2030

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 25 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 70 vs 33 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 68 vs 35 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 41 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2030
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2030 or SP Sport LM705?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2030 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 62 vs 46 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2030 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 66 vs 41 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2030 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 33 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2030 or SP Sport LM705?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 68 vs 35 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology