Dunlop SP Sport 2050 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Firestone FR740 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Firestone FR740 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport 2050 is ahead, 52–45

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2050

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 4 reviews

Firestone FR740
Tire BFirestone

FR740

All-Season tire

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    SP Sport 2050 +8
    46
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online4734

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.9 = 54

    FR740: 60% × 54.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.1 = 46

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 50

    Wet

    SP Sport 2050 +6
    44
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online4335

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 50

    FR740: 60% × 50.3 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 44

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–33

    FR740: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 33 = 48

    No road tests of snow for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    SP Sport 2050 +11
    46
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4623

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 57

    FR740: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 46

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2050 or FR740. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 57

    Noise

    SP Sport 2050 +3
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4035

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.4 = 57

    FR740: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.5 = 54

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport 2050 or FR740. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    SP Sport 2050 +5
    46
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online4133

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 51

    FR740: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.8 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for FR740. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport 2050 +16
    31
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050FR740
    Reviews found online4731
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Firestone FR740: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2050Firestone FR740
Relative Score 52 45
Dry 54 46
Wet 50 44
Snow – 48
Comfort 57 46
Noise 57 54
Treadwear 51 46
Handling (owners) 47 31

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 2050

FR740

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2050

Pros

  • Adequate dry road grip and handling response
  • Satisfactory performance in dry and wet conditions for certain drivers
  • Reasonable noise levels on smooth road surfaces

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and handling
  • Fast treadwear with low mileage limits (some wearing out within 9,000 to 18,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on damaged or rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2050 review

Tire B FR740

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050 B · Firestone FR740
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—3
Rim diameters—15″ – 17″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

Firestone FR740

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 2050 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone FR740 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 scores 47 vs 31 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 scores 57 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 scores 54 vs 46 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 scores 50 vs 44 on wet.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire B · Firestone FR740

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050, 50 vs 44 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050, 54 vs 46 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050, 57 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050, 57 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2050 or FR740?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050, 51 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology