Dunlop SP Sport 2050 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 4 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2050

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 4 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +20
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 59 (est.)77
    Reviews found online4769

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.9 = 54

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 50

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +18
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 55 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4365

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 50

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    34
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online–10

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)62
    Reviews found online4663

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 57

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 57

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4062

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.4 = 57

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport 2050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 51

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +18
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 58 (est.)74
    Reviews found online4161

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 51

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +24
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online4771
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2050Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 52 70
Dry 54 74
Wet 50 68
Snow – 34
Comfort 57 63
Noise 57 70
Treadwear 51 69
Handling (owners) 47 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 2050

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2050

Pros

  • Adequate dry road grip and handling response
  • Satisfactory performance in dry and wet conditions for certain drivers
  • Reasonable noise levels on smooth road surfaces

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and handling
  • Fast treadwear with low mileage limits (some wearing out within 9,000 to 18,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on damaged or rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2050 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 51 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 70 vs 57 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 63 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2050 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology