tirewheelguide

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2050 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–52

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or SP Sport 2050 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2050

Summer Premium Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4771

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.9 = 54

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 50

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +22
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4373

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 50

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +15
    72
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4674

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 57

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 57

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online40–

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.4 = 57

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport 2050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 51

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4165

    SP Sport 2050: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 51

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 47

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +26
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2050BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online4773
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2050Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 52 70
Dry 54 70
Wet 50 72
Comfort 57 72
Noise 57 –
Treadwear 51 65
Handling (owners) 47 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 2050

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2050

Pros

  • Adequate dry road grip and handling response
  • Satisfactory performance in dry and wet conditions for certain drivers
  • Reasonable noise levels on smooth road surfaces

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and handling
  • Fast treadwear with low mileage limits (some wearing out within 9,000 to 18,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on damaged or rough road surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2050 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2050

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2050
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2050 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology