Tests – · none yet Owners 17 · 11 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 11 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–33
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
39
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +4079Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 50 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 24 73 SP Sport 270: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 23.6 = 39
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
30
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +4777Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 40 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 15 75 SP Sport 270: 60% × 40.2 (est.) + 40% × 15.2 = 30
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
37
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +3168Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 22 67 SP Sport 270: 40% × 59.2 (est.) + 60% × 22.2 = 37
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
32
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +4274Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 46 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 10 67 SP Sport 270: 60% × 46.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 32
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
20
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +5272Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 20 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison84Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 84
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport 270 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 33 | 76 |
| Dry | 39 | 79 |
| Wet | 30 | 77 |
| Comfort | 37 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 32 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 20 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
33
/ 100
SP Sport 270
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport 270
Pros
- Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
- Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan
Cons
- Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
- Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Dunlop SP Sport 270
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
r/kereta
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-24
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 4 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 360 A A | 200 - 420 A A |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
33
/ 100
Dunlop SP Sport 270
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 20 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 30 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 32 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 39 on dry.
Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport 270 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 30 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 39 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 68 vs 37 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 32 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology