tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 275 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HP71 is ahead, 51–38

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HP71 or SP Sport 270 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 270

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 11 reviews

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 43

    Dry

    Crugen HP71 +5
    48
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online3037

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 43

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 33

    Wet

    Crugen HP71 +22
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 42 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online2049

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 41.8 (est.) + 40% × 19.9 = 33

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–48

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 49

    Comfort

    Crugen HP71 +5
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3040

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 49

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–44

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 38

    Treadwear

    Crugen HP71 +6
    44
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online1829

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 18.1 = 38

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 28

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP71 +27
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Crugen HP71
    Reviews found online2855
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 270Kumho Crugen HP71
Relative Score 38 51
Dry 43 48
Wet 33 55
Snow – 57
Comfort 49 54
Noise – 58
Treadwear 38 44
Handling (owners) 28 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 270

Crugen HP71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 270

Pros

  • Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
  • Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan

Cons

  • Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
  • Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
All owner themes in the SP Sport 270 review

Tire B Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport 270

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-03-02

“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho​ Crugen HP71​ 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW​”
r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 51 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 B · Kumho Crugen HP71
CategorySummerSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available463
Rim diameters17″ – 18″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—9.9/32″
UTQG—640 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 270

Kumho Crugen HP71

Winner: Kumho Crugen HP71 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 55 vs 28 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 55 vs 33 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 44 vs 38 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 48 vs 43 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 270
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 55 vs 33 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 48 vs 43 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 54 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or Crugen HP71?

Kumho Crugen HP71, 44 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology