Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 11 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–38

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 270

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 11 reviews

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 43

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +32
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 52 (est.)77
    Reviews found online3071

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 43

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 33

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +51
    84
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 42 (est.)91
    Reviews found online2073

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 41.8 (est.) + 40% × 19.9 = 33

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +22
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 62 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3065

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 49

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–15
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 38

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS71 +14
    52
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 51 (est.)45
    Reviews found online1863

    SP Sport 270: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 18.1 = 38

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 28

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +43
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 270Ecsta PS71
    Reviews found online2871
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 270Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 38 73
Dry 43 75
Wet 33 84
Comfort 49 71
Noise – 36
Treadwear 38 52
Handling (owners) 28 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport 270

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 270

Pros

  • Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
  • Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan

Cons

  • Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
  • Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
All owner themes in the SP Sport 270 review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport 270

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4133
Rim diameters17″ – 18″16″ – 22″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 270

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 33 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 28 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 43 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 49 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 270
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 270 or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 33 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 43 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 49 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 52 vs 38 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology