Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 11 reviews
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP Sport 270 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Aspec A349 BluEarth is ahead, 61–38
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
Aspec A349 BluEarth +1659Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 30 55 SP Sport 270: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 43
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
33
Wet
Aspec A349 BluEarth +2659Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 42 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 20 55 SP Sport 270: 60% × 41.8 (est.) + 40% × 19.9 = 33
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 59
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
49
Comfort
Aspec A349 BluEarth +1362Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 30 54 SP Sport 270: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 29.8 = 49
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
38
Treadwear
Aspec A349 BluEarth +2967Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 51 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 18 69 SP Sport 270: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 18.1 = 38
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 270. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
28
Handling (owners)
Aspec A349 BluEarth +3361Why this score
Source SP Sport 270 Aspec A349 BluEarth Reviews found online 28 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport 270 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 38 | 61 |
| Dry | 43 | 59 |
| Wet | 33 | 59 |
| Comfort | 49 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 38 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 28 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport 270
Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport 270
Pros
- Acceptable performance in dry road conditions
- Reasonable steering feel and quietness early in its lifespan
Cons
- Extremely poor and dangerous wet weather traction, often described as driving on ice
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, with many users needing replacements well under 30,000 km
- Prone to significant understeer and wheel slip on steep slopes or during low-speed maneuvers in the rain
Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport 270 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport 270
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Winner: Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 270 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 61 vs 28 on handling.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 67 vs 38 on treadwear.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 59 vs 33 on wet.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 59 vs 43 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 59 vs 33 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 59 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 62 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport 270 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 67 vs 38 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology