Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 300 vs Kumho Solus KH16 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 21 + 34 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: SP Sport 300 and Solus KH16 are level at 60.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 300
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 300

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 21 reviews

Kumho Solus KH16
Tire BKumho

Solus KH16

All-Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 34 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Level
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5554

    SP Sport 300: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    Solus KH16: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 59

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    Solus KH16 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5960

    SP Sport 300: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    Solus KH16: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online–44

    Solus KH16: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.4 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Solus KH16 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5259

    SP Sport 300: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57

    Solus KH16: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–63

    Solus KH16: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Solus KH16. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    SP Sport 300 +4
    59
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6154

    SP Sport 300: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 63

    Solus KH16: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH16. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Solus KH16 +7
    58
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 300Solus KH16
    Reviews found online5158
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 300 vs Kumho Solus KH16: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 300Kumho Solus KH16
Relative Score 60 60
Dry 59 59
Wet 62 63
Snow – 55
Comfort 57 62
Noise – 65
Treadwear 63 59
Handling (owners) 51 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 300

± 8

Solus KH16

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and mileage, with many users reporting up to 40,000 to 50,000+ miles (or 80,000 km)
  • Low road noise levels during the majority of the tire's lifespan
  • Reliable dry and wet grip for everyday city and highway driving

Cons

  • Firm, hard ride quality that some drivers find lacking in comfort
  • Increased road noise and steering wheel vibration as the tread wears down to around 3mm
  • Subpar wet weather traction reported by a few users
All owner themes in the SP Sport 300 review

Tire B Solus KH16

Pros

  • Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
  • Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives

Cons

  • Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
  • Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
  • A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
All owner themes in the Solus KH16 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 300 B · Kumho Solus KH16
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9.5/32″
UTQG300 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 300

Kumho Solus KH16

Too close to call: Dunlop SP Sport 300 and Kumho Solus KH16 are within 2 points overall. Dunlop SP Sport 300 is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Solus KH16 is stronger on handling and comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus KH16 scores 58 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus KH16 scores 62 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport 300 scores 63 vs 59 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 300
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH16

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 300 or Solus KH16?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 300 or Solus KH16?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 300 or Solus KH16?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 300 or Solus KH16?

Kumho Solus KH16, 62 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 300 or Solus KH16?

Dunlop SP Sport 300, 63 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology