Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 5 reviews
Dunlop SP Sport 560 vs Firestone Firehawk SZ90 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 5 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport 560 is ahead, 79–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 54 · 2 tests Owners 52 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
SP Sport 560 +2355Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 84 51 SP Sport 560: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.8 = 78
Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 57.9 + 40% × 51.3 = 55
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
SP Sport 560 +2753Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 51 Reviews found online 83 56 SP Sport 560: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 80
Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 50.8 + 40% × 56 = 53
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
SP Sport 560 +2652Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 82 45 SP Sport 560: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 82.3 = 78
Firehawk SZ90: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 44.7 = 52
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk SZ90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison58Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 53 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for Firehawk SZ90. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
77
Treadwear
SP Sport 560 +2057Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 83 51 SP Sport 560: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 77
Firehawk SZ90: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk SZ90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
83
Handling (owners)
SP Sport 560 +3053Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Reviews found online 83 53 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison62Why this score
Source SP Sport 560 Firehawk SZ90 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport 560 | Firestone Firehawk SZ90 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 54 |
| Dry | 78 | 55 |
| Wet | 80 | 53 |
| Comfort | 78 | 52 |
| Noise | – | 58 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 53 |
| Efficiency | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SP Sport 560
Firehawk SZ90
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport 560
Pros
- Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to other premium tires
- Strong performance and grip on dry city roads
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Handling on wet roads can be challenging, though potentially influenced by narrower tire widths
- Limited size and vehicle context availability in early feedback
Tire B Firehawk SZ90
Pros
- Strong dry and wet surface grip
- Effective water displacement and braking performance
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Excessive road noise
- Rapid or uneven tread wear
- Unpredictable handling and stability issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport 560 | B · Firestone Firehawk SZ90 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport 560
Firestone Firehawk SZ90
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 560 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 560 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 83 vs 53 on handling.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 80 vs 53 on wet.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 78 vs 52 on comfort.
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 78 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport 560 or Firehawk SZ90?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 560 or Firehawk SZ90?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 80 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 560 or Firehawk SZ90?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 560 or Firehawk SZ90?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport 560 or Firehawk SZ90?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 77 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology