Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 63 + 49 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport FM800 is ahead, 76–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    SP Sport FM800 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800K425 Kinergy Eco
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7866

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 79

    Wet

    SP Sport FM800 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800K425 Kinergy Eco
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 77 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8270

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 76.8 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79

    K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Comfort

    SP Sport FM800 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800K425 Kinergy Eco
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7664

    SP Sport FM800: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.5 = 73

    K425 Kinergy Eco: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 72

    Treadwear

    SP Sport FM800 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800K425 Kinergy Eco
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7660

    SP Sport FM800: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 72

    K425 Kinergy Eco: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FM800. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for K425 Kinergy Eco. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport FM800 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport FM800K425 Kinergy Eco
    Reviews found online7965
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport FM800Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco
Relative Score 76 67
Dry 74 67
Wet 79 70
Comfort 73 66
Treadwear 72 63
Handling (owners) 79 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport FM800

± 8

K425 Kinergy Eco

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport FM800

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong anti-aquaplaning capabilities
  • High value for money compared to premium brands like Michelin and Bridgestone
  • Low road noise and very quiet, smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Faster than average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Rubber compound can harden over time, leading to reduced performance as the tire ages
  • Softer sidewalls can occasionally result in slightly less precise steering feel
All owner themes in the SP Sport FM800 review

Tire B K425 Kinergy Eco

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable and stable handling in dry conditions

Cons

  • Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
  • High levels of cabin noise, particularly on coarse asphalt
  • Stiff, rigid ride quality
All owner themes in the K425 Kinergy Eco review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 B · Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—27
Rim diameters—13″ – 16″
UTQG320 B A220 - 400 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800

Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 79 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 74 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800
Tire B · Hankook K425 Kinergy Eco

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport FM800 or K425 Kinergy Eco?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FM800 or K425 Kinergy Eco?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 79 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FM800 or K425 Kinergy Eco?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FM800 or K425 Kinergy Eco?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 73 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport FM800 or K425 Kinergy Eco?

Dunlop SP Sport FM800, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology