Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Falken ZE912 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 200 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: SP Sport LM705 65, ZE912 66.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire BFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    ZE912 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5867

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705 or ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 63

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6660

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport LM705 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE912
    Reviews found online6463
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Falken ZE912: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Falken ZE912
Relative Score 65 66
Dry 66 66
Wet 61 68
Snow 62 –
Comfort 70 68
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 66 63
Handling (owners) 64 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport LM705

ZE912

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Falken ZE912
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters16″ – 19″—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Falken ZE912

Too close to call: Dunlop SP Sport LM705 and Falken ZE912 are within 2 points overall. Dunlop SP Sport LM705 is stronger on treadwear. Falken ZE912 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Tire B · Falken ZE912

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or ZE912?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or ZE912?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or ZE912?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or ZE912?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or ZE912?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology