Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Falken ZE914 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 99 owner reviews. How we score

ZE914 is ahead, 76–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE914
Tire BFalken

ZE914

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 99 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ZE914 +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6681

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    ZE914: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 81 = 77

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    ZE914 +15
    77
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online5980

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 62

    ZE914: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 77

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    ZE914 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    ZE914: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.9 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705 or ZE914. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    ZE914 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    ZE914: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    ZE914 +12
    78
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZE914
    Reviews found online6678
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Falken ZE914: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Falken ZE914
Relative Score 66 76
Dry 67 77
Wet 62 77
Snow 62 –
Comfort 70 73
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 67 71
Handling (owners) 66 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport LM705

± 8

ZE914

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B ZE914

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
All owner themes in the ZE914 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Falken ZE914
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters16″ – 19″—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Falken ZE914

Winner: Falken ZE914 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE914 scores 78 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE914 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Tire B · Falken ZE914

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or ZE914?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 77 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 77 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology