tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Falken ZE914 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 100 owner reviews. How we score

ZE914 leads, 75–72 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ZE914 or ContiMaxContact MC6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE914
Tire BFalken

ZE914

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 100 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ZE914 +2
    76
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7781

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    ZE914: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    ZE914 +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online7379

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73

    ZE914: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    ZE914 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7074

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69

    ZE914: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 64

    Treadwear

    ZE914 +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6ZE914
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6376

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    ZE914: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6ZE914
    Reviews found online7977
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Falken ZE914
Relative Score 72 75
Dry 74 76
Wet 73 77
Comfort 69 73
Treadwear 64 72
Handling (owners) 79 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiMaxContact MC6

± 8

ZE914

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B ZE914

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
All owner themes in the ZE914 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Falken ZE914
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters19″ – 21″—
UTQG—320 A - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Falken ZE914

Narrow edge: Falken ZE914 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Where the Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE914 scores 72 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE914 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZE914
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or ZE914?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ZE914?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ZE914?

Falken ZE914, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology