tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 39 + 1,244 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 72–65

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or SP Sport LM705 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 67 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6666

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 62

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +17
    79
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 64 (est.)85
    Reviews found online5970

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 69.5 = 79

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)60
    Reviews found online7162

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.7 = 70

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60 + 60% × 62.3 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests≈ 66 (est.)66
    Reviews found online56≈ 66 (est.)

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6863

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 63.2 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Reviews found online6666
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    31
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–31
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Relative Score 65 72
Dry 66 74
Wet 62 79
Snow 62 –
Comfort 70 61
Noise 62 66
Treadwear 68 69
Handling (owners) 66 66
Efficiency – 31

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport LM705

± 5

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available686
Rim diameters16″ – 19″14″ – 19″
UTQG400 B A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and noise. Pick the Dunlop SP Sport LM705 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 70 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 66 vs 62 on noise.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 66 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology