tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: SP Sport LM705 65, Dynapro HP 64.

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport LM705 Check price on Amazon · Dynapro HP
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    SP Sport LM705 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Dynapro HP +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5867

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7061

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 63

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6665

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport LM705 +7
    57
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705Dynapro HP
    Reviews found online6457
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Hankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 65 64
Dry 66 62
Wet 61 68
Snow 62 –
Comfort 70 65
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 64 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

SP Sport LM705

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available614
Rim diameters16″ – 19″16″ – 18″
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Hankook Dynapro HP

Too close to call: Dunlop SP Sport LM705 and Hankook Dynapro HP are within 2 points overall. Dunlop SP Sport LM705 is stronger on handling, comfort and dry. Hankook Dynapro HP is stronger on wet. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 64 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 70 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 62 on dry.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP?

Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology