Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 39 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 39 + 2,512 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,512 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1480Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 65 73 SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 73 = 80
No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +1678Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 59 75 SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 74.5 = 78
No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
62
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 56 – SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62
No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
70
Comfort
SP Sport LM705 +169Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 71 68 SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.6 = 69
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
SP Sport LM705 +161Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 56 ≈ 66 (est.) SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61
No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +674Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 68 67 SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +672Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 66 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison83Why this score
Source SP Sport LM705 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport LM705 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 75 |
| Dry | 66 | 80 |
| Wet | 62 | 78 |
| Snow | 62 | – |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 62 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
SP Sport LM705
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport LM705
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
- Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
- Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
- Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Dunlop SP Sport LM705
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 6 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Dunlop SP Sport LM705
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Where the Dunlop SP Sport LM705 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology