tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

SP Sport LM705 is ahead, 65–58

Check price on Amazon · SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama BluEarth E70
Tire BYokohama

BluEarth E70

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 16 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    SP Sport LM705 +9
    57
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6651

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    BluEarth E70: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 62

    Wet

    SP Sport LM705 +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5956

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    BluEarth E70: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 62

    No road tests of snow for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    SP Sport LM705 +20
    50
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7142

    SP Sport LM705: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.7 = 70

    BluEarth E70: 40% × 63.2 (est.) + 60% × 41.5 = 50

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62

    No road tests of noise for SP Sport LM705. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    SP Sport LM705 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    SP Sport LM705: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    BluEarth E70: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport LM705. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    SP Sport LM705 +12
    54
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport LM705BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online6654
Scores at a glance
CategoryDunlop SP Sport LM705Yokohama BluEarth E70
Relative Score 65 58
Dry 66 57
Wet 62 60
Snow 62 –
Comfort 70 50
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 68 62
Handling (owners) 66 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport LM705

± 8

BluEarth E70

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport LM705

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth bump/pothole absorption
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway operation
  • High value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet grip and poor performance in heavy rain
  • Soft sidewalls lead to mushy steering response and lack of high-speed handling feedback
  • Faster-than-expected wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the SP Sport LM705 review

Tire B BluEarth E70

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and durability
  • Predictable handling in dry conditions
  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
  • Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
  • Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
All owner themes in the BluEarth E70 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705 B · Yokohama BluEarth E70
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available64
Rim diameters16″ – 19″17″ – 18″
UTQG400 B A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705

Yokohama BluEarth E70

Winner: Dunlop SP Sport LM705 — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama BluEarth E70 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 70 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 66 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Dunlop SP Sport LM705 scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport LM705
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth E70
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 66 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 70 vs 50 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport LM705 or BluEarth E70?

Dunlop SP Sport LM705, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology