Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 22 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Dunlop SP Touring R1 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 22 + 9,892 owner reviews. How we score
SP Touring R1 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,892 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
SP Touring R1 +664Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 62 SP Touring R1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
No road tests of dry for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
SP Touring R1 +863Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 71 60 SP Touring R1: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of wet for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
SP Touring R1 +364Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 61 SP Touring R1: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of comfort for SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
SP Touring R1 +465Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 SP Touring R1: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
SP Touring R1 +1656Why this score
Source SP Touring R1 Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 72 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Touring R1 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 63 |
| Dry | 70 | 64 |
| Wet | 71 | 63 |
| Comfort | 67 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
SP Touring R1
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Touring R1
Pros
- High tread longevity and durability
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability
- Occasional road noise feedback
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Dunlop SP Touring R1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·3 upvotes ·2024-07-22
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
r/ArAutos
·2 upvotes ·2025-04-04
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2025-11-05
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Touring R1 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Dunlop SP Touring R1
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Dunlop SP Touring R1 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 72 vs 56 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 71 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 70 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Dunlop SP Touring R1
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 71 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 70 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 67 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Touring R1 or Ecowing ES31?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology