Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 3 reviews
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat vs Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle Exhilarate is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Eagle Exhilarate +1469Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online 48 69 -
59
Wet
Eagle Exhilarate +1372Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online 55 72 -
–
Snow
No comparison61Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online – 55 -
61
Comfort
Eagle Exhilarate +667Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online 53 65 -
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online – 70 -
56
Treadwear
Eagle Exhilarate +965Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Professional tests (TWG score) – 63 Reviews found online 49 67 -
49
Handling
Eagle Exhilarate +2069Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Eagle Exhilarate Reviews found online 49 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 69 |
| Dry | 55 | 69 |
| Wet | 59 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 61 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 65 |
| Handling | 49 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Azenis FK453 Runflat
Eagle Exhilarate
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Tire B Eagle Exhilarate
Pros
- Strong dry pavement handling and sporty steering response
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Reliable wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance for many users
Cons
- Reports of significant road noise, described by some as intrusive
- Inconsistent tread life and potential for uneven wear
- Polarizing performance in snow and ice conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | B · Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate
Winner: Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 69 vs 49 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 72 vs 59 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle Exhilarate scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.