Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Destination M/T2 is ahead, 67–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Destination M/T2 +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online7048
  2. 71

    Wet

    Destination M/T2 +12
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online7255
  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online71–
  4. 66

    Comfort

    Destination M/T2 +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online6353
  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online52–
  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Destination M/T2 +4
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online5649
  7. 66

    Handling

    Destination M/T2 +17
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Azenis FK453 Runflat
    Reviews found online6649
Scores at a glance
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Relative Score 67 56
Dry 69 55
Wet 71 59
Snow 70 –
Comfort 66 61
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 60 56
Handling 66 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination M/T2

Azenis FK453 Runflat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B Azenis FK453 Runflat

Pros

  • Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
  • Strong dry handling and cornering performance
  • Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires

Cons

  • Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
  • Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
All owner themes in the Azenis FK453 Runflat review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
CategoryAll Terrain and Off Road All Season tireSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available18—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth19/32″—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat

Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Leads

Destination M/T2

Amazon