Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 39 reviews
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Destination M/T2 is ahead, 67–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Destination M/T2 +1455Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 70 48 -
71
Wet
Destination M/T2 +1259Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 72 55 -
70
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 71 – -
66
Comfort
Destination M/T2 +561Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 63 53 -
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 52 – -
60
Treadwear
Destination M/T2 +456Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 56 49 -
66
Handling
Destination M/T2 +1749Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Azenis FK453 Runflat Reviews found online 66 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 56 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 71 | 59 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 61 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 56 |
| Handling | 66 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Destination M/T2
Azenis FK453 Runflat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Tire B Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination M/T2
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 49 on handling.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 59 on wet.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.