tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 39 + 1,272 owner reviews. How we score

EUROALL SEASON AS210 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · EUROALL SEASON AS210 or Destination M/T2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Tire BFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS210

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 19 tests Owners 68 · 1,272 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 (snow braking)

“Falken Euroall Season AS210 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 My mum drives an old VW Golf and needs new tyres for her car. She regularly does motorway trips and wants four tyres that will last. Two tyres that are within her budget (£300) with fitting included are the Falken Euroall Season AS210 and the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2. I'm leaning toward the Hankook just because of the brand recognition but the Falken is an all season tyre whereas the Hankook is only a summer tyre. Does this matter? The Hankook also has better fuel economy and wet braking in when I look at the EU chart but is that cancelled out by the fact it is a summer tyre and not a winter one? How much should I give to the EU rating?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Destination M/T2 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests≈ 68 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6764

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests≈ 71 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7170

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 70.4 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Destination M/T2 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests≈ 71 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7166

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 66.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)78
    Reviews found online5961

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 40% × 77.5 + 60% × 60.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    Destination M/T2 +11
    48
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests≈ 66 (est.)36
    Reviews found online47≈ 66 (est.)

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 35.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 48

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for EUROALL SEASON AS210. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    EUROALL SEASON AS210 +19
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 61 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5072

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    EUROALL SEASON AS210: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.1 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Reviews found online–66
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    20
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2EUROALL SEASON AS210
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–20
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Relative Score 66 69
Dry 67 65
Wet 71 77
Snow 71 65
Comfort 62 67
Noise 59 48
Treadwear 56 75
Handling (owners) – 66
Efficiency – 20

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Destination M/T2

± 5

EUROALL SEASON AS210

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B EUROALL SEASON AS210

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet, slushy, and snowy winter conditions
  • High value for money compared to premium competitor brands
  • Impressive braking response and aquaplaning resistance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise and tire roar reported by some users
  • Negative impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
  • Vague or spongy steering response and handling when driven hard in warm, dry weather
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS210 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Destination M/T2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Neutral

Community discussions regarding the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 predominantly consist of product listings and prospective buyers evaluating it as a budget-friendly all-season option. Users frequently compare its EU label ratings for wet grip and fuel economy against summer tires and premium all-season competitors like Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.

r/CarTalkUK ·13 upvotes ·2021-08-19

“All Season tyre vs Summer tyre with better wet grip? I’ve always just assumed that All Season tyres are going to be better for driving in wet conditions than the equivalent summer tyre, but now I’m confused. See these Falken tyres for example: Falken Sincera SN 110 - EU Wet Grip class A. Falken Euroall Season AS210 - EU Wet Grip class B-C The summer tyres are also cheaper & have better fuel economy according to the EU labels. What would be the advantage of all season tyres in these scenarios? Or am I missing something really obvious regarding how the EU ratings work? Read more”
Top themes
#budget tire comparison#all-season vs summer#EU label wet grip#fuel economy ratings#winter driving alternatives

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1892
Rim diameters15″ – 20″13″ – 20″
Tread depth19/32″—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

Narrow edge: Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Firestone Destination M/T2 if noise and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 75 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 59 vs 48 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 scores 77 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 77 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 59 vs 48 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or EUROALL SEASON AS210?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210, 75 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology