Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 3 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,495 reviews
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +2580Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 48 76 -
59
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +1978Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online 55 76 -
61
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +970Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 53 71 -
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 61 -
56
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +1773Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 49 69 -
49
Handling
Ventus Prime 4 +2574Why this score
Source Azenis FK453 Runflat Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 49 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 76 |
| Dry | 55 | 80 |
| Wet | 59 | 78 |
| Comfort | 61 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 73 |
| Handling | 49 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Azenis FK453 Runflat
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis FK453 Runflat
Pros
- Competitive pricing compared to premium run-flat alternatives
- Strong dry handling and cornering performance
- Lower noise levels than some factory-fitted run-flat tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Mediocre wet weather grip, particularly in lateral cornering
- Vague steering feedback reported by some drivers
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/TireQuestions
·1 upvote ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/croautomobili
·1 upvote ·2026-09-23
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
r/kereta
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-24
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 49 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 56 on treadwear.
Tire A · Falken Azenis FK453 Runflat
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.