Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Azenis FK510

Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 907 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 70–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +18
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests73≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7549

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +26
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 29 / – tests88≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7653

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 76.2 = 83

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Level
    55
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4445

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 55

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Dynapro AS RH03 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests42≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6848

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 41.7 + 40% × 68.2 = 52

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests66≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6951

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests72≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5756

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 57.3 = 66

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Azenis FK510 +22
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Dynapro AS RH03
    Reviews found online7149
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Relative Score 70 57
Dry 74 56
Wet 83 57
Snow 55 55
Comfort 52 59
Noise 67 61
Treadwear 66 60
Handling (owners) 71 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Dynapro AS RH03

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available93—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″14/32″
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 if comfort matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 74 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 scores 59 vs 52 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Falken Azenis FK510, 83 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Falken Azenis FK510, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Falken Azenis FK510, 67 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03, 59 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis FK510 or Dynapro AS RH03?

Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology