Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 907 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Proxes RA1 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests73≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7579

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +19
    64
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 29 / – tests88≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7661

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 76.2 = 83

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +6
    49
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online4434

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 55

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Proxes RA1 +15
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests42≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6866

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 41.7 + 40% × 68.2 = 52

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Proxes RA1 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests66≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6970

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests72≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5768

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 57.3 = 66

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes RA1 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes RA1
    Reviews found online7173
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Toyo Proxes RA1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Toyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 74 75
Wet 83 64
Snow 55 49
Comfort 52 67
Noise 67 68
Treadwear 66 67
Handling (owners) 71 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Proxes RA1

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes RA1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummerSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available937
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″8/32″
UTQG300 A A100 AA A
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 psi44 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Toyo Proxes RA1

Narrow edge: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet and snow. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if comfort matters most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 49 on snow.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Falken Azenis FK510, 83 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Falken Azenis FK510, 55 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis FK510 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology