Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 907 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Azenis FK510 70, Proxes ST 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests73≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 29 / – tests88≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7677

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 76.2 = 83

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Proxes ST +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4464

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 55

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 52

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +20
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests42≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6874

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 41.7 + 40% × 68.2 = 52

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online69–

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 68.7 = 67

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5772

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 57.3 = 66

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Proxes ST
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 70 71
Dry 74 72
Wet 83 75
Snow 55 66
Comfort 52 72
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes ST

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available931
Rim diameters17″ – 22″19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Toyo Proxes ST

Too close to call: Falken Azenis FK510 and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on wet. Toyo Proxes ST is stronger on comfort, snow and treadwear. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 55 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Falken Azenis FK510, 83 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Azenis FK510 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology