tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Azenis FK510 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (value)

“Faulken azenis fk510 tires Anyone running these , I’ve ordered a set of wheels and tires from steeda, unfortunately they do not have any nitto n555 g2 tires available i the sizes ive requested “nothing close infact to get a complete set” ive checked all the distributors thru my job and websites. They have however come up with a set of these 275/35/19 fronts and 305/30/19 rears , in comparison the rears will sit approximately 1/2 lower then fronts which will eliminate some rake with the car. Does anyone have experience with these tires? Money wise ill save like 200$ though money is not a factor as oppse to my car came with 235”s and they have to go.”

Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)7277
    Reviews found online7669
    Dry Braking (% of best)70%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best)97%99%
  2. 83

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +15
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)8770
    Reviews found online7766
    Wet Braking (% of best)99%87%
    Wet Handling (% of best)98%97%
  3. 55

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +19
    36
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online4514
  4. 52

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)4262
    Reviews found online6864
  5. 68

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)6874
    Reviews found online6861
  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)7274
    Reviews found online5761
  7. 71

    Handling

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 74 74
Wet 83 68
Snow 55 36
Comfort 52 63
Noise 68 69
Treadwear 66 69
Handling 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis FK510

ADVAN Fleva V701

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryAzenis FK510ADVAN Fleva V701ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 70% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 98% #5/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −27.7 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #8/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 99% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −1.9 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +5.0 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −1.2 Different tests
Price Other 71% #2/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +0.3 Different tests
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Other 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 85% #2/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires −30.8 Same test
Value Other 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 57% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +43.4 Different tests
Wear Other 87% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +20.8 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 11% #9/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test +8.9 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 96% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +3.4 Same test
Subj. Comfort Subj 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +14.4 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Same test
Wet Braking Wet 99% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 87% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +11.7 Same test
Wet Handling Wet 98% #4/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test 97% #19/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +1.0 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/Autocross ·1 upvote ·2023-12-18

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”
r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-03-09

“The Falken Azenis FK510 would be my choice of what you have listed, not that either the Conti or Nitto is a bad tire... but on my Corvette I had Nexen N'Fera SU1 and absolutely loved them and drove rather... aggressively.”
r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2023-09-23

“Got a full set of FK510 for my model 3 and I luv em, the low profile really shows off the red performance calibers.”
Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9370
Rim diameters17″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG300 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better snow and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 63 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

Azenis FK510

Amazon