Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis PT722 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 78 owner reviews. How we score
Azenis PT722 is ahead, 66–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 78 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Azenis PT722 +957Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 65 51 Azenis PT722: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Solus TA31: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57
No road tests of dry for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
64
Wet
Azenis PT722 +460Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 62 56 Azenis PT722: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64
Solus TA31: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
No road tests of wet for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison54Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online – 43 Solus TA31: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Azenis PT722 +660Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 55 Azenis PT722: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
Solus TA31: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 55.1 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Solus TA31: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 64
No road tests of noise for Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Azenis PT722 +1357Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 51 Azenis PT722: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Solus TA31: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Azenis PT722 +1850Why this score
Source Azenis PT722 Solus TA31 Reviews found online 68 50
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis PT722 | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 58 |
| Dry | 66 | 57 |
| Wet | 64 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 54 |
| Comfort | 66 | 60 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 50 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Azenis PT722
58
/ 100
Solus TA31
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis PT722
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Excellent value for the price point
Cons
- Unpredictable or poor traction in wet conditions
- Lack of progressive grip when reaching traction limits
- Inconsistent performance across different vehicle platforms
Tire B Solus TA31
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
- Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting
Cons
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
- Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis PT722 | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 22 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Falken Azenis PT722
58
/ 100
Kumho Solus TA31
Winner: Falken Azenis PT722 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Azenis PT722 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 68 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 70 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 66 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Azenis PT722 scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Azenis PT722
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31?
Which is better in the wet, Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31?
Falken Azenis PT722, 64 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31?
Falken Azenis PT722, 66 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31?
Falken Azenis PT722, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Azenis PT722 or Solus TA31?
Falken Azenis PT722, 70 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology