Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Falken Azenis PT722 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,457 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk Indy 500 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

Falken Azenis PT722
Tire BFalken

Azenis PT722

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Firehawk Indy 500 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7765

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Firehawk Indy 500 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 45

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)–
    Reviews found online27–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 27.4 = 45

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Azenis PT722 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6465

    Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65

    Azenis PT722: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis PT722 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6173

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66

    Azenis PT722: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Azenis PT722. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk Indy 500 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Azenis PT722
    Reviews found online7167
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Falken Azenis PT722: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Falken Azenis PT722
Relative Score 69 66
Dry 74 66
Wet 66 64
Snow 45 –
Comfort 65 66
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 66 71
Handling (owners) 71 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Firehawk Indy 500

± 8

Azenis PT722

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk Indy 500

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
All owner themes in the Firehawk Indy 500 review

Tire B Azenis PT722

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Excellent value for the price point

Cons

  • Unpredictable or poor traction in wet conditions
  • Lack of progressive grip when reaching traction limits
  • Inconsistent performance across different vehicle platforms
All owner themes in the Azenis PT722 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly praised as an exceptional value and 'bang for your buck' summer performance tire. Drivers consistently highlight strong dry grip, commendable wet traction, comfortable ride quality, and progressive handling breakaway. Minor criticisms center on reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer steering feedback, and grease on hard track sessions.

r/FiestaST ·22 upvotes ·2018-04-09

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

jaguarforums.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by JLT Bridgestone Potenza, Dunlop SP Sport Maxx and the Pirellis and Michelins. My DD isn’t an F-Type (I need back seats and an XF/XE are too slow 😜 )but I do have some tire input. I’m a huge fan of Michelin PSS and PS4S, but recently switched to experiment with Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 (also known as Bridgestone Potenza RE003 outside North America). In all honesty, I’ve only had them on for 2 weeks, done some 1/4 mile passes but no circuit track yet(due this summer). They replaced my PSS that still we’re at 4/32. So far I’m loving them and at half the cost.. I’m sure there’s a traction difference on a circuit track(maybe becomes greasy faster?) but for aggressive street use, I’ve yet to see/feel any differences. Fyi, I’m not too worried about thread life, most of my tires expire before they near 2/32.”

r/E90 ·1 upvote ·2022-06-26

“I used to run MPSS tires on my style 162's and I could do about 30k miles max on my 2008 e90 335xi FBO. Once I switched to Summer performance firehawk indy 500's... I am about 50% thru the tread and I have put on about 40k miles so far. They are not as good as MPSS, but at 1/2 the price of a set of MPSS i'm perfectly fine with the minor compromise in performance. The only issue I noticed was, if the firehawks sit over night, they generally get a flat spot which will be noticeable for a few miles. By the time you reach your freeway the flat spot will be back to normal again. I HIGHLY RECOMMEND the Firehawks for a daily driver!!!! Best quality and performance at this price point!!!”

Top themes
#value for money#dry grip performance#wet road traction#ride comfort#cold temperature limitations#track and autocross use#sidewall and steering response

Based on 141 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis PT722

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Falken Azenis PT722
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG340 A A440 - 600 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Falken Azenis PT722

Narrow edge: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better dry. Pick the Falken Azenis PT722 if treadwear matters most to you. Falken Azenis PT722 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis PT722 scores 71 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Falken Azenis PT722

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk Indy 500 or Azenis PT722?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk Indy 500 or Azenis PT722?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk Indy 500 or Azenis PT722?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk Indy 500 or Azenis PT722?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk Indy 500 or Azenis PT722?

Falken Azenis PT722, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology