Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Kumho Ecsta V730 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis RT 615 leads, 62–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis RT 615

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Tire BKumho

Ecsta V730

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 187 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Ecsta V730 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online6376
  2. 58

    Wet

    Azenis RT 615 +21
    37
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online5425
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online–37
  4. 61

    Comfort

    Ecsta V730 +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online5255
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online–63
  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Azenis RT 615 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online6460
  7. 63

    Handling

    Ecsta V730 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615Ecsta V730
    Reviews found online6368
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Kumho Ecsta V730: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis RT 615Kumho Ecsta V730
Relative Score 62 59
Dry 65 73
Wet 58 37
Snow – 50
Comfort 61 62
Noise – 65
Treadwear 64 62
Handling 63 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis RT 615

Ecsta V730

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis RT 615

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
  • Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving

Cons

  • Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
  • Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
All owner themes in the Azenis RT 615 review

Tire B Ecsta V730

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
  • High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
  • Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
  • Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
  • Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
All owner themes in the Ecsta V730 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis RT 615 B · Kumho Ecsta V730
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Tread depth—8.5/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis RT 615

Kumho Ecsta V730

Winner: Falken Azenis RT 615 — better wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 58 vs 37 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 68 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Falken Azenis RT 615
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V730

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

62

Narrow edge

Azenis RT 615

Amazon