Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Kumho Ecsta V730 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Azenis RT 615 leads, 62–59 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 187 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Ecsta V730 +873Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 63 76 -
58
Wet
Azenis RT 615 +2137Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 54 25 -
–
Snow
No comparison50Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online – 37 -
61
Comfort
Ecsta V730 +162Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 52 55 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online – 63 -
64
Treadwear
Azenis RT 615 +262Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 64 60 -
63
Handling
Ecsta V730 +568Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 Ecsta V730 Reviews found online 63 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT 615 | Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 59 |
| Dry | 65 | 73 |
| Wet | 58 | 37 |
| Snow | – | 50 |
| Comfort | 61 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 62 |
| Handling | 63 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Azenis RT 615
Ecsta V730
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Tire B Ecsta V730
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and predictable handling characteristics at the limit.
- High heat tolerance with minimal 'greasy' drop-off during long track sessions.
- Superior tread life and durability compared to many direct 200TW competitors.
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance, particularly with standing water or worn tread.
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperature, making them poor for cold-weather street use.
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise due to the stiff sidewall construction.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT 615 | B · Kumho Ecsta V730 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Azenis RT 615
Kumho Ecsta V730
Winner: Falken Azenis RT 615 — better wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta V730 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 58 vs 37 on wet.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 73 vs 65 on dry.
Kumho Ecsta V730 scores 68 vs 63 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.