Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
Falken Azenis RT 615 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin CITY Pro looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Michelin CITY Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 CITY Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Azenis RT 615: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of dry for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
58
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 CITY Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – Azenis RT 615: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 58
No road tests of wet for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
60
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 CITY Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Azenis RT 615: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Azenis RT 615. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 CITY Pro Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Azenis RT 615: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Azenis RT 615. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Azenis RT 615 CITY Pro Reviews found online 64 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT 615 | Michelin CITY Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | – |
| Dry | 65 | – |
| Wet | 58 | – |
| Comfort | 60 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Azenis RT 615
–
/ 100
CITY Pro
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Tire B CITY Pro
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet-weather traction and water dispersion
- High versatility including light off-road capability
Cons
- Mixed long-term performance expectations
- Limited suitability for high-powered motorcycles
- Inconsistent user satisfaction regarding overall longevity
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT 615 | B · Michelin CITY Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Falken Azenis RT 615
–
/ 100
Michelin CITY Pro
Only Falken Azenis RT 615 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Falken Azenis RT 615
Tire B · Michelin CITY Pro
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology