tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

A539 is ahead, 69–62

Check price on Amazon · A539 or Azenis RT 615 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

Azenis RT 615

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Tire BYokohama

A539

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 105 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    A539 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615A539
    Reviews found online6368
  2. 58

    Wet

    A539 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615A539
    Reviews found online5470
  3. 61

    Comfort

    A539 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615A539
    Reviews found online5270
  4. 64

    Treadwear

    A539 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615A539
    Reviews found online6466
  5. 63

    Handling

    A539 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis RT 615A539
    Reviews found online6374
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken Azenis RT 615Yokohama A539
Relative Score 62 69
Dry 65 68
Wet 58 70
Comfort 61 69
Treadwear 64 66
Handling 63 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Azenis RT 615

A539

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis RT 615

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
  • Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving

Cons

  • Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
  • Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
All owner themes in the Azenis RT 615 review

Tire B A539

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
  • Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
  • Good braking performance

Cons

  • Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
  • Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
  • Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
All owner themes in the A539 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis RT 615 B · Yokohama A539
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—6
Rim diameters—12″ – 14″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis RT 615

Yokohama A539

Winner: Yokohama A539 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama A539 scores 70 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A539 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama A539 scores 68 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis RT 615
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama A539
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

69

Leads

A539

Amazon