Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Azenis RT-615K vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 6 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk Indy 500 is ahead, 65–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Firehawk Indy 500 +1474Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 55 77 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 74
No road tests of dry for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
53
Wet
Firehawk Indy 500 +1366Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 47 65 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47 = 53
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of wet for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
35
Snow
Firehawk Indy 500 +1045Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 11 27 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 11 = 35
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.3 = 45
No road tests of snow for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
Firehawk Indy 500 +1365Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 44 64 Azenis RT-615K: 40% × 63.6 (est.) + 60% × 43.5 = 52
Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
58
Noise
Firehawk Indy 500 +765Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 45 64 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 58
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
No road tests of noise for Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
40
Treadwear
Firehawk Indy 500 +2666Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 51 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 24 61 Azenis RT-615K: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 23.9 = 40
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Azenis RT-615K. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Firehawk Indy 500 +1371Why this score
Source Azenis RT-615K Firehawk Indy 500 Reviews found online 58 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT-615K | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 65 |
| Dry | 60 | 74 |
| Wet | 53 | 66 |
| Snow | 35 | 45 |
| Comfort | 52 | 65 |
| Noise | 58 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 40 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Azenis RT-615K
65
/ 100
Firehawk Indy 500
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Azenis RT-615K
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and handling around corners
- Telepathic and highly responsive steering feedback
- Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan under aggressive driving
- Dangerous winter and snow performance
- Increased road noise at highway speeds
Tire B Firehawk Indy 500
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
- Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
- Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Falken Azenis RT-615K
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly praised as an exceptional value and 'bang for your buck' summer performance tire. Drivers consistently highlight strong dry grip, commendable wet traction, comfortable ride quality, and progressive handling breakaway. Minor criticisms center on reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer steering feedback, and grease on hard track sessions.
grassrootsmotorsports.com
“I need a 224/45/15 I run these on my S2000 wheelset for driving around town and they are great. I also have used them for plenty of track days. They get a little greasy towards the end of sessions but have never let me down.”
r/Mustang
·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13
“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”
r/tires
·5 upvotes ·2025-11-27
“Need recommendations for an All Season tire that's comparable to Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 in a 205 45 17 Live in Southern California. Car only gets about 3,000-4,000 Miles a year. Tire size is 205 45 17 Currently have Firehawk Indy 500 but I got them used for $150 a couple years ago and they're done now. Cheaper options would be nice for new.”
Top themes
#value for money#dry grip performance#wet road traction#ride comfort#cold temperature limitations#track and autocross use#sidewall and steering response
Based on 141 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT-615K | B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 47 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Falken Azenis RT-615K
65
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken Azenis RT-615K rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 53 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 65 vs 52 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Azenis RT-615K
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Which is better in the wet, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 45 vs 35 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 65 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 65 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Azenis RT-615K or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology