Tests 75 · 5 tests Owners 54 · 46 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2025 AMS Sustainability Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken e.Ziex vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 0 road tests and 46 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
e.Ziex is ahead, 75–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
e.Ziex +1960Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests 82 ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 74 (est.) 55 e.Ziex: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 73.8 (est.) = 79
G FIT AS: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 60
No owner ratings of dry for e.Ziex. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
e.Ziex +1758Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests 76 ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 73 (est.) 53 e.Ziex: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 73.4 (est.) = 75
G FIT AS: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
No owner ratings of wet for e.Ziex. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison59Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online – 51 G FIT AS: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 59
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
e.Ziex +1061Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 73 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 70 (est.) 58 e.Ziex: 40% × 72.8 + 60% × 69.6 (est.) = 71
G FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
No owner ratings of comfort for e.Ziex. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests 70 – Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) – e.Ziex: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for e.Ziex. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
e.Ziex +1555Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 71 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online ≈ 68 (est.) 47 e.Ziex: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 68 (est.) = 70
G FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 55
No owner ratings of treadwear for e.Ziex. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison56Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Reviews found online – 56 -
96
Efficiency
No comparison–Why this score
Source e.Ziex G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests 96 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken e.Ziex | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 58 |
| Dry | 79 | 60 |
| Wet | 75 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 59 |
| Comfort | 71 | 61 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 56 |
| Efficiency | 96 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
e.Ziex
58
/ 100
G FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A e.Ziex
Pros
- Improved vehicle efficiency and increased driving range
- Smooth and comfortable running
- Great performance and confidence through standing water
Cons
- Louder road noise than expected
- Grip level considered inferior compared to previous tire models
- Faster than expected tread wear
Tire B G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken e.Ziex | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 500 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Falken e.Ziex
58
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
Winner: Falken e.Ziex — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken e.Ziex scores 79 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken e.Ziex scores 75 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken e.Ziex scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken e.Ziex scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken e.Ziex
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
e.Ziex or G FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, e.Ziex or G FIT AS?
Falken e.Ziex, 75 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, e.Ziex or G FIT AS?
Falken e.Ziex, 79 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, e.Ziex or G FIT AS?
Falken e.Ziex, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, e.Ziex or G FIT AS?
Falken e.Ziex, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology