Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews
Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken FK451 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 10 + 192 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Vorti is ahead, 80–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 14 tests Owners 79 · 192 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Ultrac Vorti +1783Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 65 84 FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 83 + 40% × 84.3 = 83
No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
Ultrac Vorti +1181Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 70 79 FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 79.1 = 81
No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
68
Comfort
Ultrac Vorti +977Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 67 78 FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 77.6 = 77
No road tests of comfort for FK451. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 71 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac Vorti. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Ultrac Vorti +572Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 68 73 FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 72.7 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Ultrac Vorti +1883Why this score
Source FK451 Ultrac Vorti Reviews found online 65 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK451 | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 80 |
| Dry | 66 | 83 |
| Wet | 70 | 81 |
| Comfort | 68 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK451
Ultrac Vorti
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK451
Pros
- Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Excellent tread life and durability
Cons
- Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
- Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
- Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
Tire B Ultrac Vorti
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- High value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Excellent steering feedback and driver confidence
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or on heavy rear-wheel-drive/high-power vehicles
- Wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance considered inferior to top competitors like Michelin or Continental by a minority of users
- Stiff sidewalls on low-profile sizes can negatively impact comfort or lead to cupping
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK451 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 42 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 24″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken FK451
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 83 vs 65 on handling.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 83 vs 66 on dry.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 81 vs 70 on wet.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 77 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK451 or Ultrac Vorti?
Which is better in the wet, FK451 or Ultrac Vorti?
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 81 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK451 or Ultrac Vorti?
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 83 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK451 or Ultrac Vorti?
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 77 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK451 or Ultrac Vorti?
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology